Uncyclopedia:VFH/Marijuana

Article: Marijuana	Score: 8 deadly gateway drugs
Nominated by:	Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 18:52, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
For: 12	NF A page that could've easily been crap is now....not.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 18:52, 13 October 2007 (UTC) High EugeneKay wuz here (whine thank) 18:53, 13 October 2007 (UTC) WHEEEE Haha (Bonner) (Talk) Oct 13, 18:54 For enlightening the world about this death plant and the malevolent users of it. Ж Kalir _{totally not Wario at all} 18:55, 13 October 2007 (UTC) For. Yeah man, and other such clichés... --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 18:58, 13 October 2007 (UTC) Dig maaaaaannnnnn.. --THINKER 23:45, 13 October 2007 (UTC) Weak for. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 23:55, 13 October 2007 (UTC) For Evil_One275 \| Talk \| Contribs 01:11, 14 October 2007 (UTC) For -- Roro (talk) (Contribs) 18:20, 14 October 2007 (UTC) There's gotta be some sort of witty pun for this one...Ummm...Zombiebaron...yes...that made everyone laugh...now I can sign this and get out of here... -- The Zombiebaron 02:49, 15 October 2007 (UTC) For SUPPORT OUR TROOPS!-- Phlegm Leoispotter * (garble! jank!) 00:01, 18 October 2007 (UTC) Zombiebaron -RA HB 23:01, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
Against: 4	Woeful Against I really wanted to like this one. (I also wanted to make a funny joke with my 'for' vote.) However, while Ljlego is correct by saying isn't crap, it just doesn't do it for me. In other words, I didn't find it funny. While being factual works for many pages, in this case I felt like I was reading Wikipedia! It seems like the main/only humor comes from linking to specific pages for comedic effect. Meanwhile, the few images it has aren't laugh out loud, although the kid with all the bags comes close. If we are going to feature marijuana, it needs to be hilarious, and not just to people who are reading it while high. -- Kip the Egg Talk Works 08:21, 14 October 2007 (UTC) Somewhat undecided against. While a massive improvement on previous versions, Kip makes a good point. It's very, very good, but not up to feature quality IMHO. RabbiTechno 11:37, 14 October 2007 (UTC) Against. Very dry, and not in a good way. Sir Groovester \| Contributions \| Talk Page 14:23, 14 October 2007 (UTC) Against. Not a "strong" against since there are some good parts and it's well-written but too much of it is dry or overly-factual or relies on humour based around linking to other parts of the site (as mentioned above). Could (and should) be better --Zarbag 17:35, 17 October 2007 (UTC) Comment Not to be a sore loser, but I don't ever remember putting any facts in this article. I did some research, but not for correct facts. Ж Kalir _{totally not Wario at all} 01:11, 22 October 2007 (UTC) Against It has some funny moments (particularly "FDA approved alternatives"), but it's just too fact-y. In order to pull off this sort of humor, the article has to be self-conscious of its own facts—something this article doesn't do. As a result, it just comes off dry— like toast, not like humor. --_CUN RA ^{Talk to me} _ 23:45, 23 October 2007 (UTC)