Uncyclopedia:VFH/Thunderstorm of 1976 (harder, better, faster, stronger)

Article: Thunderstorm of 1976	Score: 3 heroes
Nominated by:	Black flamingo
For: 9	I really like this. --Black Flamingo 21:30, July 27, 2011 (UTC) TOAST. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 17:17, 28 July 2011 For. Very informative. --EMC^[TALK]02:39 Jul 29 2011 For. ShabiDOO 02:53, July 29, 2011 (UTC) Tiasto. Also, for judging articles by content and content alone. Let's not forget that even the esteemed Qua had a posthumous feature. TKFU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U UU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U CK 21:24, July 29, 2011 (UTC) For. Now BAGEL, that guy was just a dick. User:Mrthejazz/sig 03:32, August 2, 2011 (UTC) For -- The Zombiebaron 05:34, August 3, 2011 (UTC) For. Feels like my writing style, only more random and better. I'm not how to feel about this. Sir Oliphaunte (განხილვა) 12:52, August 4, 2011 (UTC) For. Jmplayer 18:29, August 9, 2011 (UTC)
Against: 6	Against. See below. *RomArtusImperator ® (Orate) 13:00, July 29, 2011 (UTC) Weak Against It's missing something. Dr. Fenwick 21:07, July 29, 2011 (UTC) Against. I just didn't laugh that much, I'm afraid. Nameable • mumble? 14:45, July 31, 2011 (UTC) Strongly Against. Also see below. -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. Rap sheet. [[::File:Sexy_twilight.jpeg\|His shameless obsession.]] 07:29 August 15, 2011 (UTC) Against. I'm unaware of this whole "TOAST" thing, but this article did not make me lol. -OptyC Sucks! CUN19:08, 15 Aug Unfunny. Against**. Sorry — (talk) (contributions) 17:26, August 15, 2011 (UTC)
Comments	Comment. For those not in the know, TOAST was a sockpuppet of a group of users and then subsequently banned. *RomArtusImperator ® (Orate) 13:05, July 29, 2011 (UTC) How is that relevant? —Sir Socky** (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 13:26, 29 July 2011 Collabs should be in the open, this one wasn't. It lead to ballot box stuffing by users not declaring an interest in the outcome of the vote. So for me at least, this article comes with baggage. --*RomArtusImperator ® (Orate) 13:34, July 29, 2011 (UTC) There was no "ballot stuffing." The people who operated the collab account (which I think is a pretty cool idea actually) made sure not to vote with TOAST, since all they wanted to do was write without the territorial tag of authorship, not fix feature votes with an extra account. -- TKFU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U UU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U CK 15:57, July 31, 2011 (UTC) TOAST went against the spirit of an open wiki like this one to have a team of users operating a ghost account with a password and access granted to a select few. That's my point TKF. --RomArtusImperator ®* (Orate) 18:22, July 31, 2011 (UTC) I thought writing hilarious articles was the spirit of the wiki. I'm not gonna try to condone what TOAST was, even if I thought it was a pretty cool idea, but the notion of ostensibly eliminating authorship seems eliminate territorialism and play into the whole "anyone can edit" thing more than anything else about this site I can remember. Plus, writing hilarious articles. -- TKFU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U UU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U CK 03:35, August 2, 2011 (UTC) The author(s) of this page truly defined the concept of "dickery." It's not the account sharing or sockpuppeteering that bothers me, it's people spewing crap like referring to every single non-TOAST editor as "fag." Perhaps it's just my two cents, but I don't think people like that deserve to have their names--or works--on the front page. -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. Rap sheet. [[::File:Sexy_twilight.jpeg\|His shameless obsession.]] 07:29 August 15, 2011 (UTC) Abstain. Don't love it. Don't hate it. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 07:01, August 4, 2011 (UTC)