User talk:Step13

Welcome!

Hello, Step13, and welcome to Uncyclopedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If not, the door's right over there... no, a little more to your left... yeah. Anyway, here are a few good links for nooblets:

• Beginner's Guide
• How to be funny and not just stupid

If you read anything at all, make it the above two links. If you want to find out more about Uncyclopedia or need more help with something, try these:

• About Uncyclopedia and The five pliers of Uncyclopedia
• Everything you ever wanted to know, but were afraid to ask
• Help Pages - if you need help with a specific issue

I hope you enjoy editing here and being an Uncyclopedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~) or use the "sign" button () above the edit box. This will automatically produce your name and the date.

If you need help, ask me on my talk page, or ask at the Dump. Again, welcome!  -- SonicChao ^Babbel!_Contribs 19:32, 8 October 2006 (UTC)

deal

VFH UCAS and I'll read and review the UnNews article.

I'll do it now as a good will gesture. Sorry it comes to this but this thing is full of yanks. ;) --Darwin of suburbia 15:43, 20 August 2007 (UTC)

Alas, two votes were not enough. Never mind.

Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Holocaust exaggeration

Dude, just exaggerate the holocaust. That was my suggestion. Did you know that there are two articles called Holocaust Denial (Holocaust denial)??? Search for "holocaust" and you'll get a bunch of garbage. For this one, don't bother telling us about it (another suggestion) just exaggerate the holocaust! Sorry that I wasn't more clear on my suggestion. If you aren't willing to do that, there are better articles that tackle the holocaust than this.

There's one thing your article has that no other article does: exaggerating the holocaust. It's weird, it's wacky, do it and leave out the "explanation" parts. So how was that?

--  Le Cejak • <-> 13:48, 6 November 2007 (UTC)

You're welcome. It's to the benefit of your article to concede to harsh criticism. Glad I could help! --  Le Cejak • <-> 13:53, 6 November 2007 (UTC)