From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Article: Why?:Stick Things in the Electrical Outlet
|
Score: 16 screwdrivers jammed in the outlet
|
Nominated by:
|
Sir Unknown User (Talk : Cont : VFH : PEE : CUN) 01:28, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
|
For: 16
|
- Nom and For-Brilliant concept, did excellent (41!) on Pee. Enjoy!-- Sir Unknown User (Talk : Cont : VFH : PEE : CUN) 01:28, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
- For--Æ 01:29, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
- For Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 19 / 01:29)
- 4 - Solid, man. - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 01:55, Dec 19
- foa - Nice work --Major'GUN' Ggarfield, Le Marquis de Nofu .Complex! 20:03, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
- Forks go in the outlet -- Spillin DylanTALKEDITS02:49, Dec 20
- For. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 11:33, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
- Фор This is very funny. —Oblivion - Fire - Sex [O|F|S] MUN CM NS F@H (drivel) 23:53, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
- Фор --General Insineratehymn 02:10, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
- For --Shocking idea. MrN 22:55, Dec 21
- For Dame GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 16:03, 22 December 2007 (UTC)
- Blrzzt – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • critchat) 17:54 Dec 22, 2007
- For. This article is as irresistible as an...electrical...outletttttttt.../me gets my fork and goes to my outlet. Pretty! ~Minitrue Sir SysRq! Talk! Sex! =/ GUN • WotM • RotM • AotM • VFH • SK • PEEING • HP • BFF (@ 18:36 23 Dec, 2007)
- For -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 20:35, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
- Forktastic. -- Hindleyite Converse • ?pedia 18:10, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
- For Why not? --Dallasallad 21:48, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
|
Against: 0
|
#Just doesn't do it for me :( This article is a bit funny in its coverage of what can be done with an electrical outlet, but it doesnt really cover why to do those things. It continuously says what has been done, but never lives up to the title of the article. I have to admit that i love the concept, but this concept got almost no coverage in the article, instead letting other articles explain why to do such things. Robertodole 17:52, 22 December 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments
|
- Thank you for your opinion. I really appreciate it. But could you be a bit more specific when you say that it got almost no coverage of the concept? I don't mind that you voted no but you really should take another look at it, and tell me what you didn't like or wanted to be included, before voting.-- Sir Unknown User (Talk : Cont : VFH : PEE : CUN) 19:41, 22 December 2007 (UTC)
I just woke up, and now im all groggy and cant tell funny from not funny, so i took out my vote comletely Robertodole 01:58, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
|
VFH
← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH
Always check the feature queue first.
Note: the queue slot won't be properly filled until the {{FA}} code (with correct date) is on the article.
Just follow the instructions if you're unsure.