Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Top 10 best hidden secrets in video-game history
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
[edit source]
-Maniac1075Complain Here 13:19, June 28, 2010 (UTC)
Humour: | 3 | Taking notes here by section.
Overall: definitely could be improved. More jokes, less nonsense for the sake of writing nonsense, more satire, less vulgar content (again, some may differ with me on what to tone down). |
Concept: | 7 | The concept's not that bad, you know. We all love easter eggs—well, at least I do, obsessive prick that I am. It's just interesting to see what in-jokes get left over from development. And there's a sublime mixture of the fictional and the real here. It just needs to be executed more cleanly. |
Prose and formatting: | 4 | Yeah, I understand the article needs proofreading, which is part of the reason for the mediocre score. But the formatting isn't half bad; variety of left-right image alignment, good use of sections and bullets, etc. I'm not so sure you need that mass media template, though. The article title's so long that it breaks the template anyway. Consider not having that template. |
Images: | 6 | Pretty much no qualms beyond, you know, what I said about humour. Not being a gamer, I'm not sure what's original and what's not, which along with the content are the reasons for this score. |
Miscellaneous: | 4 | Key points, to recap: execution, satire, YouTube copy-and-paste, sublime, has potential. Honestly I'm not the best person to ask about this article, since I haven't played any of these games, and I'm not sure who has either. You might want to ask around or in the forums ... |
Final Score: | 24 | Keep up the work, and this surely will go up with it.
Yeah, that sentence makes no sense, if you were wondering. |
Reviewer: | Sir MacMania GUN—[19:03 19 Jul 2010] |