Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Sunn O)))

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Sunn O)))[edit source]

I didn't make, but I poured quite a bit of work into this. If you don't know, check here and listen to this. --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 7:04 PM 7/18/10

Humour: 6 *IntroMuch like the rest of the article there is this weird tone to it. Its not professional due to it describing the sound and also saying its "really damn powerful" its cute, not funny.
  • Beginnings The strongest section in the article, the formation of a musical group should be interesting and add in their real names and its even better. The Cliff Burton bit I also found funny. I wish I could break this down a bit more but there really is nothing more to say.
Concept: 8.5 Its an original idea, an article that features this kind of musician instead of the egomaniac/loser music artist that tends to be written about on Uncyclopedia. On the same end however the most interesting part of the article itself is the title.
Prose and formatting: 5 Sloppy. The narrator's "voice" and speech pattern change too much for an article of this size and the topic. And its distracting, also way too much use of using symbols to describe the sound I felt. Its okay but its not funny and really for me at least not that interesting. Maybe a music junkie will flock to this article but for your average music appreciator it just doesn't work.
Images: 4.5 Yeah the two images are nice and all but why are they so close together? Move one of the images further down. Its just too jumbled and like the rest of the article just feels smashed together any ol' kind of way. Images break up the reading and aesthetically make the article interesting to read, maybe thats why I found "The Beginning" to be the best part.
Miscellaneous: 3.5 There needs to be more ending on their musical style is such a weird place to end it. End it another way even if its a standard "see also" it just doesn't work like that its like a roller coaster that stops halfway through when you're already getting bored, maybe thats a good thing but if you want people to really like the article you need to change it.
Final Score: 27.5 This article still needs a lot of work, the main problem being its boring and not that funny. Not to be mean I'm just telling you how it is. Hope you make it better, the concept is good it has potential it just needs a lot of cosmetic work and substantive work.
Reviewer: --Dr. Fenwick 21:18, August 18, 2010 (UTC)