Forum:The vast majority of Uncyclopedia rejoices
However, being the little non-conformist bastard that I am, I'm not one of them. What the heck, guys? {{USERNAME}} doesn't work anymore? I came across it while checking to see if this still existed, and it looks broke at the bottom of the page. Then I went to Template:USERNAME and while the first instance of it works just fine, the second two (You sucks. Userpage's userpage sucks too.) don't. Why's it work some times and not others? I, for one, love scaring the crap out of people with {{USERNAME}} and the expressions when they find out it's a trick is priceless. Seriously. I've got a photo album. So what gives? <insert name here> fucking things up again on the site? – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • critchat) 15:09 Jun 08, 2008
- <insert name here> really is a cock isn't it? -- 15:19, 8 June 2008 (UTC)
- Yes, <insert name here> does have a cock. -- 15:27, 8 June 2008 (UTC)
- If {{USERNAME}} suddenly looks like <insert name here>, you may have unknowingly added some .js that makes it not work. I did the same thing a while back. - Don Leddy the Crunch (Nyah, see, nyah!) 16:17, Jun 8
- Yes, <insert name here> does have a cock. -- 15:27, 8 June 2008 (UTC)
At first I thought it said rejuices. I was going to write about how juicing up is no good--Nytrospawn 17:59, 8 June 2008 (UTC)
- Pardon? I did something? --Gingerpig 19:11, 8 June 2008 (UTC)
FU SPANG
- FU – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • critchat) 19:16 Jun 08, 2008
- Delete., and his little fuck-buddy, <insert name here>... I meant TheLedBalloon. • <19:29, 08 Jun 2008>
Stephen Colbert has his eyes on you. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 21:21, 8 June 2008 (UTC)